GoodGym: Harnessing Exercise for Social Good
You can read the full case study below or take a look at and download the infographic – which provides a short, print-friendly summary of the case study – here.
GoodGym is a charity born in 2008, in the belief that the considerable human energy expended in gyms could be expended more usefully. Now established in 50 locations in the UK, GoodGym finds ways for people to help reduce social isolation, help elderly people and serve community projects through exercise. GoodGym has been supported by Nesta’s Centre for Social Action Innovation Fund, The National Lottery Community Fund and BT funding, and independently evaluated by Ecorys.
How does GoodGym work?
GoodGym helps runners to do social good in three ways:
- Mission Runs: GoodGym runners run to help vulnerable, isolated and housebound people with one-off household and garden tasks they can’t do on their own.
- Coach Runs: GoodGym runners are paired with isolated older people. They run to see them each week.
- Group Runs: A group of runners meets and runs to help with a task for the benefit of the local community. Running there, completing the task and running back takes 90 minutes maximum. Group Runs occur once per week, and are led by GoodGym trainers.
Source: GoodGym website
GoodGym represents a “fine grain” approach to volunteering, whereby participation is based on frequent, low-impact activities integrated usefully into runners’ lives. This helps sustain motivation and the availability of runners.
What impact is GoodGym having?
Ecorys conducted 14 in-depth interviews with runners and coaches, and 89 matched (both baseline and follow-up) surveys – 70 from runners and 19 from older people. The evaluation met the criteria for Level 2, with Nesta concluding “strong qualitative evidence supports some detailed quantitative evidence to provide a convincing indication of impact.”
- GoodGym has facilitated 136,001 good deeds, completed by 14,413 runners, at the time of writing.
- Coaches (isolated older people) reported positive outcomes relating to emotional isolation, with the quality of the coach relationship being key.
- All coaches felt happier, and 98% considered their runner a friend.
- On a scale of 1-5, with 1 being the most isolated, social isolation improved from 2.44 to 2.74, and frequency of feeling lonely from 2.11 to 2.58.
- On a scale of 0-10, with 0 being the least satisfied, average life satisfaction scores rose from 4.78 to 6.11.
- Longitudinal survey found that 57% of GoodGym runners would not have joined another gym.
- Average days per month spent running increased by 0.7 days six months after joining.
- GoodGym runners reported an average weekly increase in moderate (0.29 days) and vigorous (0.21 days) physical activity.
Ecorys applied Sport England’s MOVES model to show the potential return on investment of GoodGym’s running element. The key findings were:
- The running element is cost-efficient when cost per participant is compared with data around other community-based projects designed to impact physical activity.
- GoodGym’s cost-per-outcome ranges from £3,498 to £7,692 per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY), a generic measure of health-related wellbeing factoring in quality and duration of life. This is far under the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s recommended willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000.
- The return on investment based on willingness to pay for QALYs shows positive results, ranging from £2.78 to £4.56 per £1 invested.
What can GoodGym teach us about effective relationship-centred design?
In real relationships, all parties are genuinely and mutually valued.
We think that one of the reasons that GoodGym has been so successful is that it’s based on a model of mutual benefit. Sometimes with initiatives that seek to reduce loneliness the exchange is one-way; the isolated person is done ‘unto’. This is disempowering and unsustainable. In the GoodGym model, the ‘recipient’ (the person who receives a visit and gets help with a task) is not just a recipient; they provide motivation to the ‘volunteer’, helping them to achieve something that is meaningful to them (exercise).
Relationships often work best when they align with participants’ existing values.
In GoodGym’s case, aligning the development of new relationships with the existing value ‘volunteers’ place on running offers an important, if not sufficient, incentive to maintain the relationship.
Relationship-centred design can help evolve cultural norms.
Running is typically seen as a functional and individual pursuit. Where it is social, such as with running clubs, this sociality is typically confined to club members. GoodGym demonstrates, perhaps counter-intuitively, that people can actually be more likely to run when their workout is combined with a social or volunteering visit. GoodGym has helped expand the notion of running into something more community focused.
What’s next for GoodGym?
GoodGym continues to expand across the UK. Following Ecorys evaluation, GoodGym has received funding from the National Community Lottery Community Fund, and is continuing to develop its monitoring and evaluation framework, particularly to strengthen analysis around cost-effectiveness.
Want to learn more?
- GoodGym has an introduction to the idea on its website.
- You can also read examples of GoodGym activities on the website.
- Nesta’s website features an overview of the Ecorys impact evaluation.
- The full Ecorys evaluation report is online.
Has this case study inspired any comments, ideas or critiques?
Please do get in touch with us at firstname.lastname@example.org if so. An essential part of the Relationships Project is learning from others engaged in thinking about relationship-centred design. We don’t have all the answers, so hope some people reading will contribute suggestions.